Philip R. Stanforth

62 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Philip R. Stanforth
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 445
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 311
  • Physiology 548
  • Rehabilitation 110
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 320
Replace R. C. Serfass with:
R. C. Serfass United States
Dale R. Wagner United States
Michael V. Fedewa United States
B. A. Stamford United States
Joel M. Stager United States
Jean‐René Lacour France
Sverre Mæhlum Norway
Olivier Dupuy France
Mike Climstein Australia
Raija Laukkanen Finland
Philip R. Stanforth relative to R. C. Serfass United States R. C. Serfass's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
R. C. Serfass · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip R. Stanforth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip R. Stanforth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip R. Stanforth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip R. Stanforth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip R. Stanforth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip R. Stanforth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip R. Stanforth. The network helps show where Philip R. Stanforth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip R. Stanforth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip R. Stanforth Line = papers co-authored together Philip R. Stanforth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999135
2 2015110
3 2001109
4 201093
5 201372
6 198371
7 201369
8 199668
9 200160
10 198260
11 199857
12 200457
13 200452
14 199846
15 200144
16 202237
17 200236
18 201736
19 200034
20 198233

About Philip R. Stanforth

Philip R. Stanforth is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Cell Biology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (26 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (23 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (15 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (11 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (7 papers), Physical Activity and Health (6 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (445 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (311 citations), Physiology (548 citations), Rehabilitation (110 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (320 citations). Philip R. Stanforth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jack H. Wilmore, Claude Bouchard, James S. Skinner, Arthur S. Leon, D. C. Rao, T. C. Rotkis, Matthew Stults‐Kolehmainen, Thomas W. Boyden, Richard W. Pamenter and Treva Rice. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, International Journal of Sports Medicine, Metabolism and Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact