Philip O’Kane

982 citations
23 papers · 736 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Philip O’Kane

23 papers receiving 698 citations

Peers

Philip O’Kane
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Signal Processing 589
  • Computer Networks and Communications 495
  • Information Systems 375
  • Software 62
  • Artificial Intelligence 210
Replace Nolen Scaife with:
Nolen Scaife United States
David Barrera Canada
Amin Kharraz United States
Brendan Saltaformaggio United States
Luyi Xing United States
Paul Pearce United States
Barbara Oliboni Italy
Lars Baumgärtner Germany
Ali Zand United States
X. Sean Wang China
Philip O’Kane relative to Nolen Scaife United States Nolen Scaife's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nolen Scaife · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip O’Kane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip O’Kane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip O’Kane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip O’Kane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip O’Kane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip O’Kane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip O’Kane. The network helps show where Philip O’Kane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Philip O’Kane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip O’Kane Line = papers co-authored together Philip O’Kane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011158
2 2019128
3 201878
4 201367
5 202153
6 201930
7 201728
8 201628
9 201925
10 198124
11 201724
12 201315
13 201415
14 198212
15 201112
16 20219
17 20118
18 20127
19 20066
20 20195

About Philip O’Kane

Philip O’Kane is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence and Strategy and Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (15 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (12 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (2 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (2 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (589 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (495 citations), Information Systems (375 citations), Software (62 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (210 citations). Philip O’Kane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Korea and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include Sakir Sezer, Kieran McLaughlin, Domhnall Carlin, Mustafa Kaiiali, Sakir Sezer, Eul Gyu Im, Niall McLaughlin, David Hassan, Kieran McLaughlin and Alexandra Cowan. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Security & Privacy, IEEE Access, The International Journal of the History of Sport, European Journal of Operational Research and International Review for the Sociology of Sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact