Philip E. Cleary

1.4k citations
34 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Philip E. Cleary

33 papers receiving 976 citations

Peers

Philip E. Cleary
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Ophthalmology 832
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 566
  • Neurology 84
  • Surgery 140
  • Neurology 23
Replace Jonathan Herschler with:
Jonathan Herschler United States
Terry J. Bergstrom United States
Farnaz Memarzadeh United States
Ronald L. Fellman United States
Alexandre Sellam France
Silvia Orengo-Nania United States
Sibel Oto Türkiye
Louisa Wickham United Kingdom
Magda Gharbiya Italy
Miriam Zalish Israel
Philip E. Cleary relative to Jonathan Herschler United States Jonathan Herschler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Jonathan Herschler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Cleary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Cleary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Cleary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Cleary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Cleary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Cleary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Cleary. The network helps show where Philip E. Cleary may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Cleary, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. Cleary Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. Cleary links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979139
2 1979125
3 2003101
4 198080
5 198175
6 197972
7 198067
8 197959
9 197858
10 197857
11 199739
12 200033
13 197625
14 200524
15 200724
16 198721
17 198220
18 200519
19 200513
20 200112

About Philip E. Cleary

Philip E. Cleary is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (17 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (12 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Connexins and lens biology (3 papers) and Child Abuse and Related Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (832 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (566 citations), Neurology (84 citations), Surgery (140 citations) and Neurology (23 citations). Philip E. Cleary has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Ryan, Donald Minckler, P K Leaver, Alan C. Bird, S K Gibran, Jiang Huai Wang, Peter Dockery, H. P. Redmond, D J Spalton and Michael Goggin. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Eye, Developments in ophthalmology and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact