Philip E. Best

40 papers receiving 840 citations

Peers

Philip E. Best
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 240
  • Radiation 191
  • Computational Mechanics 275
  • Structural Biology 15
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 207
Replace Akira Kurokawa with:
Akira Kurokawa Japan
J.A. Cairns United Kingdom
Wei‐Kan Chu United States
José Antonio Aznárez Spain
S. Scaglione Italy
A. Johansen Denmark
DONALD A. WIEGAND United States
Pawan Gupta India
C.A. Colmenares United States
R. Jenkins United States
Philip E. Best relative to Akira Kurokawa Japan Akira Kurokawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Akira Kurokawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip E. Best

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip E. Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip E. Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip E. Best more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip E. Best

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip E. Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip E. Best. The network helps show where Philip E. Best may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Philip E. Best, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip E. Best Line = papers co-authored together Philip E. Best links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196690
2 199177
3 199357
4 199255
5 199050
6 198649
7 196245
8 196842
9 198842
10 196241
11 199241
12 198727
13 197526
14 198826
15 196225
16 197922
17 197920
18 198919
19 197118
20 197617

About Philip E. Best

Philip E. Best is a scholar working on Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Radiation, Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biophysics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 936 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (17 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (12 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (5 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers) and Radiative Heat Transfer Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (240 citations), Radiation (191 citations), Computational Mechanics (275 citations), Structural Biology (15 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (207 citations). Philip E. Best has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include P.R. Solomon, James R. Markham, Robert M. Carangelo, Zhenzhong Yu, J.L. Robins, D.G. Hamblen, S. Charpenay, Robert J. Santoro, HRATCH G. SEMERJIAN and J.C.L. Cornish. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Combustion and Flame, Applied Spectroscopy and ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact