P.H. Lamont

19 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

P.H. Lamont
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Animal Science and Zoology 112
  • Infectious Diseases 193
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 97
  • Microbiology 55
  • Genetics 156
Replace Scott Fw with:
Scott Fw United States
F. Bürki Austria
H. K. Shieh Taiwan
Dunne Hw United States
McCollum Wh United States
Takaaki Sugimura Japan
Robert F. Kahrs United States
G. Wibberley United Arab Emirates
G. N. Mowat United Kingdom
Stanley S. Stone United States
P.H. Lamont relative to Scott Fw United States Scott Fw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Scott Fw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P.H. Lamont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.H. Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.H. Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.H. Lamont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.H. Lamont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.H. Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.H. Lamont. The network helps show where P.H. Lamont may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside P.H. Lamont, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P.H. Lamont Line = papers co-authored together P.H. Lamont links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 196663
2 196561
3 196241
4 196540
5 196031
6
Studies on relationships between human and porcine influenza. 1. Serological evidence of infection in swine in Great Britain with an influenza A virus antigenically like human Hong Kong-68 virus.
197230
7 196523
8 197022
9
The production by hysterectomy of pathogen-free, colostrum-deprived pigs and the foundation of a minimal-disease herd.
196017
10 196214
11 196813
12 195813
13 197812
14
Studies on relationships between human and porcine influenza. 2. Immunological comparisons of human A-Hong Kong-68 virus with influenza A viruses of porcine origin.
197210
15 19688
16 19724
17 19762
18 19662
19 19751

About P.H. Lamont

P.H. Lamont is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, Genetics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (10 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (10 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (3 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (3 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers) and Respiratory viral infections research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (112 citations), Infectious Diseases (193 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (97 citations), Microbiology (55 citations) and Genetics (156 citations). P.H. Lamont has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include J.H. Darbyshire, Patrick Dawson, A.O. Betts, A.R. Jennings, Azizan Omar, Helio Gelli Pereira, G. C. Schild, Colin M. Brand, James W. Harkness and D. F. Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Research in Veterinary Science, Journal of Comparative Pathology, Nature and Journal of Virology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact