Ph. Emplit

1.3k citations
39 papers · 950 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ph. Emplit

38 papers receiving 918 citations

Peers

Ph. Emplit
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 444
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 759
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 455
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 4
  • Mathematical Physics 33
Replace С. В. Сазонов with:
С. В. Сазонов Russia
V. S. Shchesnovich Brazil
А. М. Башаров Russia
Javid Atai Australia
R. Dubertrand France
J. F. Corney Australia
C. E. Creffield Spain
A. Berntson Sweden
Kyu-Hwang Yeon South Korea
A. T. Avelar Brazil
Ph. Emplit relative to С. В. Сазонов Russia С. В. Сазонов's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
С. В. Сазонов · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ph. Emplit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ph. Emplit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ph. Emplit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ph. Emplit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ph. Emplit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ph. Emplit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ph. Emplit. The network helps show where Ph. Emplit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ph. Emplit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ph. Emplit Line = papers co-authored together Ph. Emplit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001159
2 199488
3 199984
4 199171
5 200261
6 199449
7 199842
8 200338
9 199032
10 201028
11 199326
12 199224
13 199722
14 200020
15 200919
16 199319
17 200417
18 201116
19 200516
20 200516

About Ph. Emplit

Ph. Emplit is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 39 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (35 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (16 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (14 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (11 papers), Optical Network Technologies (11 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (6 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (5 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (444 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (759 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (455 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (4 citations) and Mathematical Physics (33 citations). Ph. Emplit has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marc Haelterman, J.-P. Hamaide, Gaëtan Van Simaeys, Stéphane Coen, Yu. S. Kivshar, Mustapha Tlidi, Pascal Kockaert, Frank Dubois, Olivier Hugon and François Reynaud. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Physical Review Letters, Electronics Letters, Optics Communications and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact