Peter Woit

786 citations
41 papers · 493 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Woit

38 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Peter Woit
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 216
  • History and Philosophy of Science 42
  • Condensed Matter Physics 74
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 66
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 120
Replace Federico Benitez with:
Federico Benitez Switzerland
Philip Gibbs United Kingdom
S.L. Panfil Russia
Manfred Requardt Germany
Lewis Ryder United Kingdom
Alfred Rieckers Germany
Simon Friederich Netherlands
Kurt Sundermeyer Germany
H. P. Dürr Germany
Taksu Cheon Japan
Peter Woit relative to Federico Benitez Switzerland Federico Benitez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Federico Benitez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Woit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Woit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Woit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Woit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Woit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Woit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Woit. The network helps show where Peter Woit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Woit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Woit Line = papers co-authored together Peter Woit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198397
2
Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law
200689
3 201757
4
Not even wrong : the failure of string theory and the continuing challenge to unify the laws of physics
200646
5 198545
6
Not Even Wrong
200636
7 198430
8 198618
9 200217
10 198712
11 19869
12 19895
13 19883
14 19903
15 20172
16 20021
17 20171
18 20171
19 20171
20 20171

About Peter Woit

Peter Woit is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (3 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (3 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (216 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (74 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (66 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (120 citations). Peter Woit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gyan Bhanot, Eliezer Rabinovici, Nathan Seiberg, S. Sanielevici and H. Gausterer. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B, American Scientist, Physical Review Letters and International Journal of Modern Physics D.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact