Peter Woit

774 citations
15 papers · 432 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Woit

15 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Peter Woit
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 208
  • History and Philosophy of Science 36
  • Condensed Matter Physics 74
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 57
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 107
Replace Federico Benitez with:
Federico Benitez Switzerland
Frank A. J. L. James United Kingdom
F. A. Kaempffer Canada
Lewis Ryder United Kingdom
Donald H. Perkins United Kingdom
Barry J. Harrington United States
Simon Friederich Netherlands
Ralph Schiller United States
Maurice Ebison Czechia
S. Malin United States
Peter Woit relative to Federico Benitez Switzerland Federico Benitez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Federico Benitez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Woit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Woit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Woit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Woit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Woit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Woit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Woit. The network helps show where Peter Woit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Woit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Woit Line = papers co-authored together Peter Woit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 198392
2
Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law
200679
3 201752
4 198545
5
Not even wrong : the failure of string theory and the continuing challenge to unify the laws of physics
200637
6
Not Even Wrong
200632
7 198430
8 200217
9 198617
10 198712
11 19869
12 19895
13 19883
14 20021
15
Quantum Theory, Groups and Representations: An Introduction (under construction)
20161

About Peter Woit

Peter Woit is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (2 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (1 paper), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (1 paper) and Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (208 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (74 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (57 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (107 citations). Peter Woit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Seiberg, Gyan Bhanot, Eliezer Rabinovici, S. Sanielevici and H. Gausterer. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B, American Scientist, Physical Review Letters and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact