Peter Wild

1.5k citations
41 papers · 698 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Wild

38 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers

Peter Wild
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Signal Processing 568
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 360
  • Information Systems 250
  • Safety Research 87
  • Transportation 49
Replace Akanksha Joshi with:
Akanksha Joshi India
Oscar Miguel‐Hurtado Spain
Umarani Jayaraman India
Aditya Ramesh United States
Maleika Heenaye-Mamode Khan Mauritius
Daniela Moctezuma Mexico
Jiyi Li Japan
Wang Xin-xi China
Jeffrey Edgington United States
Diaa Uliyan Jordan
Peter Wild relative to Akanksha Joshi India Akanksha Joshi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Akanksha Joshi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Wild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Wild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Wild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Wild. The network helps show where Peter Wild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Wild Line = papers co-authored together Peter Wild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201290
2 201468
3 200056
4 201548
5 201348
6
Iris Recognition: From Segmentation to Template Security
201247
7 201237
8 201635
9 201726
10 201124
11 201623
12 200921
13 201518
14 201517
15 201016
16 201914
17
Experimental evidence of ageing in hand biometrics
201312
18 200911
19 201411
20 200710

About Peter Wild

Peter Wild is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Safety Research and Genetics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biometric Identification and Security (27 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (13 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (5 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (4 papers), Image and Object Detection Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (3 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers) and Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (568 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (360 citations), Information Systems (250 citations), Safety Research (87 citations) and Transportation (49 citations). Peter Wild has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Uhl, Christian Rathgeb, James Ferryman, John A. Dearing, Heinz Hofbauer, Fernando Alonso‐Fernandez, Josef Bigün, Lulu Chen, Emanuela Marasco and Bojan Čukić. Their work appears in journals such as Western American literature, Rhetoric Review, Maritime Policy & Management, Designs Codes and Cryptography and Pattern Recognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact