Peter Weale

4.0k citations
35 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Weale

35 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Weale
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 591
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 395
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 177
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Surgery 131
Replace Michaela Schmidt with:
Michaela Schmidt Germany
Renate Jerec̆ić United States
Mihaela Amzulescu Belgium
Valentina Taviani United States
Jochen von Spiczak Switzerland
Mohamed Ouhlous Netherlands
Ioannis Koktzoglou United States
Patrick Krumm Germany
Linda M. de Heer Netherlands
J. Bock Germany
Peter Weale relative to Michaela Schmidt Germany Michaela Schmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Michaela Schmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Weale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Weale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Weale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Weale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Weale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Weale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Weale. The network helps show where Peter Weale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Weale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Weale Line = papers co-authored together Peter Weale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016259
2 2010105
3 201384
4 201483
5 200878
6 201272
7 200961
8 201149
9 201046
10 201644
11 200944
12 200943
13 201437
14 201431
15 200630
16 200930
17 201020
18 201813
19 200913
20 200910

About Peter Weale

Peter Weale is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (14 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (2 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (591 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (395 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (177 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations) and Surgery (131 citations). Peter Weale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James Carr, Renate Jerec̆ić, Sven Zuehlsdorff, Stefan Neubauer, Jane M Francis, Matthew D. Robson, Debiao Li, Zhaoyang Fan, Steffen E. Petersen and David Tuite. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging and European Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact