Peter Vetter

1.3k citations
73 papers · 957 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Vetter

70 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers

Peter Vetter
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 748
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 161
  • Computer Networks and Communications 114
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 150
  • Media Technology 23
Replace R. John with:
R. John United States
Ge Zhang China
Rongzhen Li China
Yintang Yang China
Ce Wang China
Motoharu Matsuura Japan
Huan Chen China
Douglas Charles La Tulipe United States
Chih‐Wei Chen Taiwan
Peter Vetter relative to R. John United States R. John's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
R. John · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Vetter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Vetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Vetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Vetter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Vetter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Vetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Vetter. The network helps show where Peter Vetter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Vetter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Vetter Line = papers co-authored together Peter Vetter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010130
2 199358
3 199354
4 199343
5 201239
6 200138
7 201238
8 201237
9 201228
10 201426
11 201422
12 201421
13 201420
14 201220
15 199519
16 202017
17 201316
18 201716
19 201416
20 201216

About Peter Vetter

Peter Vetter is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Computer Networks and Communications and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 73 papers that have together received 957 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Network Technologies (38 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (36 papers), Advanced Optical Network Technologies (28 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (17 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (10 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (6 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (5 papers) and Phase Change Materials Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (748 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (161 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (114 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (150 citations) and Media Technology (23 citations). Peter Vetter has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tatsuo Uchida, Dusan Suvakovic, Doutje van Veen, Oliver Blume, S.K. Korotky, Gary Atkinson, Vincent Houtsma, Daniel C. Kilper, S.K. Goyal and Xin Yin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Electronics Letters, IEEE Communications Magazine and IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact