Peter Stroh

617 citations
20 papers · 458 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Stroh

18 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Peter Stroh
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Ecological Modeling 76
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 197
  • Ecology 191
  • Global and Planetary Change 158
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 95
Replace Uwe Riecken with:
Uwe Riecken Germany
Anna Maria Fosaa Faroe Islands
Rocco Labadessa Italy
Paulo Flores Ribeiro Portugal
Lotten J. Johansson Sweden
Emma Ladouceur Germany
Violeta Hevia Spain
Chuping Wu China
Timo Conradi Germany
Christoph Moning Germany
Peter Stroh relative to Uwe Riecken Germany Uwe Riecken's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Uwe Riecken · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stroh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stroh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stroh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stroh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stroh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stroh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stroh. The network helps show where Peter Stroh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stroh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Stroh Line = papers co-authored together Peter Stroh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201675
2
A vascular plant red list for England
201468
3 201165
4 201460
5 201058
6 201245
7 201119
8 201915
9 20229
10 20179
11 20228
12 20137
13 19876
14 20195
15 20203
16 20172
17
Monitoring large-scale wetland restoration projects: Is there an end in sight?
20082
18
Net Ecosystem Carbon Dioxide Exchange at Semi-Natural and Regenerating Temperate Fens
20121
19 20201
20 20250

About Peter Stroh

Peter Stroh is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 20 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (76 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (197 citations), Ecology (191 citations), Global and Planetary Change (158 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (95 citations). Peter Stroh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Francine M. R. Hughes, J. O. Mountford, William M. Adams, Kevin J. Walker, Stuart Warrington, Tim H. Sparks, K. J. Kirby, Michael F. Fay, F. J. Rumsey and Tom August. Their work appears in journals such as Restoration Ecology, Journal for Nature Conservation, Ecology and Evolution, Organizational Dynamics and Applied Vegetation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact