Peter Stoll
Impact in
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 31
- Forest ecology and management 7
-
- Plant and animal studies 18
- Co-authors
- Jacob Weiner (8 shared papers)Bernhard Schmid (7 shared papers)Daniel Prati (2 shared papers)David M. Newbery (4 shared papers)Helene C. Muller‐Landau (2 shared papers)Bruno Baur (8 shared papers)Andreas Erhardt (5 shared papers)Jürg Stöcklin (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Ecology (6 papers)Ecology (5 papers)Oecologia (3 papers)The American Naturalist (3 papers)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Stoll
55 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.6k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 939
- Ecological Modeling 187
- Global and Planetary Change 701
- Ecology 530
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stoll
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stoll. The network helps show where Peter Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 308 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 222 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 185 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 142 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 136 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 136 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 135 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 118 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 104 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 96 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 74 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 63 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 62 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 47 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 47 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 47 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 46 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 40 |
About Peter Stoll
Peter Stoll is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology and Insect Science, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers), Forest ecology and management (7 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (939 citations), Ecological Modeling (187 citations), Global and Planetary Change (701 citations) and Ecology (530 citations). Peter Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jacob Weiner, Bernhard Schmid, Daniel Prati, David M. Newbery, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Bruno Baur, Andreas Erhardt, Jürg Stöcklin, Heinz Müller‐Schärer and Anette Baur. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ecology, Ecology, Oecologia, The American Naturalist and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.