Peter Steiger

1.5k citations
21 papers · 1.1k · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Steiger

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Steiger
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 749
  • Surgery 291
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 109
  • Physiology 149
  • Nephrology 36
Replace K Faulkner with:
K Faulkner United States
Jos Nijs Belgium
Stephen H. Kan United States
C. van Kuijk Netherlands
J. R. Zanchetta Argentina
J. Varlow United Kingdom
Cătălina Poiană Romania
Lauren A. Burt Canada
Michael G. Yeates Australia
Jarkko Jokihaara Finland
Peter Steiger relative to K Faulkner United States K Faulkner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
K Faulkner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Steiger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Steiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Steiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Steiger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Steiger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Steiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Steiger. The network helps show where Peter Steiger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Steiger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Steiger Line = papers co-authored together Peter Steiger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992320
2 1991227
3 1997126
4 1989120
5 199187
6 198984
7 198771
8 201428
9 201914
10 19906
11 19876
12 20095
13 19965
14 19915
15 19912
16 19902
17
New developments in bone densitometry.
19892
18 19821
19
Forecasting Method for Estimation of Labor Times in Complex Projects illustrated by a Factory Planning Case Study
20081
20 19891

About Peter Steiger

Peter Steiger is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Physiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (11 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (2 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (749 citations), Surgery (291 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (109 citations), Physiology (149 citations) and Nephrology (36 citations). Peter Steiger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Steven R. Cummings, Harry K. Genant, Dennis M. Black, Bruce Ettinger, Jon E. Block, Katie L. Stone, Lisa Palermo, C.C. Glueer, S. T. Harris and Philipp Lang. Their work appears in journals such as Maturitas, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Radiology and Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact