Peter Sperber

467 citations
33 papers · 384 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Sperber

31 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Peter Sperber
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 6
  • Biomedical Engineering 282
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 41
  • Mechanical Engineering 166
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 114
Replace Pierre Galarneau with:
Pierre Galarneau Canada
В. В. Попов Russia
Joanne Deval France
K. Weir United Kingdom
Hideki Kawakatsu Japan
J. G. Ortega-Mendoza Mexico
Mitsuteru Kimura Japan
Keita Morimoto Japan
Stephan Dottermusch Germany
Ryan C. Tung United States
Peter Sperber relative to Pierre Galarneau Canada Pierre Galarneau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
Pierre Galarneau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Sperber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Sperber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Sperber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Sperber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Sperber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Sperber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Sperber. The network helps show where Peter Sperber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Sperber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Sperber Line = papers co-authored together Peter Sperber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198865
2 198641
3 200738
4 200735
5 198434
6 200731
7 200619
8 200815
9 198510
10 198610
11 20079
12 19879
13 20058
14 20098
15 20067
16 20076
17 20046
18 20085
19 20044
20 20094

About Peter Sperber

Peter Sperber is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 33 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (21 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (19 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (12 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (5 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (4 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (3 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (3 papers) and Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (6 citations), Biomedical Engineering (282 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (41 citations), Mechanical Engineering (166 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (114 citations). Peter Sperber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include А. Penzkofer, Rolf Rascher, Lyndon Smith, Richard Stamp, Gordon Smith, A. Penzkofer, Christian Vogt, Melvyn Smith, Roland Maurer and Florian Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Optical and Quantum Electronics, Precision Engineering, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Applied Physics B and Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact