Peter Speier

1.7k citations
67 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Speier

57 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Speier
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 832
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 131
  • Radiation 36
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 107
  • Computational Mathematics 2
Replace Sònia Nielles‐Vallespin with:
Sònia Nielles‐Vallespin United Kingdom
Peng Lai United States
Pierre‐André Vuissoz France
Jesse Hamilton United States
Simone Coppo Switzerland
Christoph Forman Germany
Gastão Cruz United Kingdom
J. Andrew Derbyshire United States
Jonathan I. Sperl Germany
Peter Speier relative to Sònia Nielles‐Vallespin United Kingdom Sònia Nielles‐Vallespin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Sònia Nielles‐Vallespin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Speier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Speier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Speier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Speier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Speier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Speier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Speier. The network helps show where Peter Speier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Speier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Speier Line = papers co-authored together Peter Speier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006146
2 2012128
3 2009123
4 201276
5 200652
6 201944
7 201642
8 200639
9 201839
10 200937
11 201737
12 201836
13 201834
14 201133
15 202028
16 201827
17 202125
18 201924
19 201320
20 202020

About Peter Speier

Peter Speier is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiation, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (35 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (20 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (7 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (7 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (832 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (131 citations), Radiation (36 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (107 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). Peter Speier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sònia Nielles‐Vallespin, Michael Bock, Akram M. Shaaban, Ganesh Adluru, Chris McGann, Eugene Kholmovski, Edward DiBella, Daniel Stäb, Frank Lehmann‐Horn and Michaela Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Investigative Radiology and Medical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact