Peter Spáč

430 citations
57 papers · 227 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Spáč

42 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers

Peter Spáč
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Political Science and International Relations 164
  • Public Administration 16
  • Communication 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 105
  • Gender Studies 21
Replace Petr Voda with:
Petr Voda Czechia
Lukáš Linek Czechia
Jürgen Mittag Germany
Fernando Bizzarro United States
Juan Andrés Moraes Uruguay
Astrid Barrio Spain
Robin E. Best United States
Jairo Nicolau Brazil
Alenka Krašovec Slovenia
Rosa Sánchez Salgado Netherlands
Peter Spáč relative to Petr Voda Czechia Petr Voda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Petr Voda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Spáč

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Spáč's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Spáč with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Spáč more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Spáč

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Spáč. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Spáč. The network helps show where Peter Spáč may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Spáč, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Spáč Line = papers co-authored together Peter Spáč links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201840
2
Populist Political Parties in East-Central Europe
201229
3 201616
4 201811
5 202010
6 20139
7 20148
8 20198
9 20198
10 20227
11 20207
12
Volební mapy České a Slovenské republiky po roce 1993: vzorce,trendy, proměny
20126
13 20215
14 20165
15 20215
16 20164
17 20184
18 20174
19
Slovakia: Record holder in the lowest turnout
20144
20
Slovakia: In Search of Limits
20133

About Peter Spáč

Peter Spáč is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 57 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (14 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (14 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers), Education, Psychology, and Social Research (5 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (4 papers) and Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (164 citations), Public Administration (16 citations), Communication (17 citations), Sociology and Political Science (105 citations) and Gender Studies (21 citations). Peter Spáč has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Petr Voda, Marek Rybář, Vlastimil Havlík, Alenka Krašovec, Alena Kluknavská, Miloš Gregor and Andrew Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, Electoral Studies, Problems of Post-Communism, Government Information Quarterly and Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact