Peter Slinn

442 citations
25 papers · 112 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Law top 5%
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
    • Legal Issues in South Africa
    • International Development and Aid

Papers in

Peter Slinn

17 papers receiving 87 citations

Peers

Peter Slinn
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Law 46
  • Development 11
  • Political Science and International Relations 53
  • Anthropology 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 55
Replace Ulf Sundhaussen with:
Ulf Sundhaussen Australia
Gino J. Naldi Greece
Vernon Valentine Palmer United States
C. L. Lim Hong Kong
Marco Bünte Germany
Rudolf Bernhardt Germany
Li-ann Thio Singapore
Emmanuel Decaux France
T. Ginsburg United States
Jo M. Pasqualucci United States
Peter Slinn relative to Ulf Sundhaussen Australia Ulf Sundhaussen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Ulf Sundhaussen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Slinn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Slinn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Slinn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Slinn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Slinn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Slinn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Slinn. The network helps show where Peter Slinn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Slinn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Slinn Line = papers co-authored together Peter Slinn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200422
2 200421
3 197116
4 19957
5 19806
6 19916
7 19826
8
International law of development : comparative perspectives
19875
9 20165
10
Parliamentary supremacy and judicial independence : a Commonwealth approach : proceedings of the Latimer House Joint Colloquium, June 1998
19994
11 19904
12 19993
13 20183
14 19961
15 19961
16 19961
17 19831
18 20090
19 19890
20 20190

About Peter Slinn

Peter Slinn is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Strategy and Management, having authored 25 papers that have together received 112 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Issues in South Africa (5 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (4 papers), Legal principles and applications (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (3 papers), South African History and Culture (2 papers), Human Rights and Development (2 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (46 citations), Development (11 citations), Political Science and International Relations (53 citations), Anthropology (16 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (55 citations). Peter Slinn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include John Hatchard, Muna Ndulo, Francis Snyder, John Kendle and Simon Coldham. Their work appears in journals such as International Relations, The American Historical Review, African Affairs, Journal of African Law and Commonwealth Law Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact