Peter Sinčák

93 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers

Peter Sinčák
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Space and Planetary Science 32
  • Health Informatics 19
  • Control and Systems Engineering 209
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 188
  • Artificial Intelligence 298
Replace Gunther Heidemann with:
Gunther Heidemann Germany
Stefano Ferrari Italy
Silvio Barra Italy
Silas Franco dos Reis Alves Brazil
M. Kalaiselvi Geetha India
Claudio De Stefano Italy
Francesco Fontanella Italy
Stephan K. Chalup Australia
Hedi Tabia France
Roberto Prevete Italy
Peter Sinčák relative to Gunther Heidemann Germany Gunther Heidemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Gunther Heidemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Sinčák

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Sinčák's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Sinčák with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Sinčák more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Sinčák

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Sinčák. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Sinčák. The network helps show where Peter Sinčák may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Sinčák, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Sinčák Line = papers co-authored together Peter Sinčák links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020197
2 2018102
3 202062
4 201950
5 202038
6 200528
7 201327
8 200825
9
Intelligent technologies - theory and applications : new trends in intelligent technologies
200222
10 201318
11 201818
12 201418
13 201417
14 200415
15 202114
16 201814
17 201414
18 201913
19 201912
20 201311

About Peter Sinčák

Peter Sinčák is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 102 papers that have together received 996 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotics and Automated Systems (24 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (16 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (16 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (14 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (11 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (7 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (6 papers) and Face and Expression Recognition (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Space and Planetary Science (32 citations), Health Informatics (19 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (209 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (188 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (298 citations). Peter Sinčák has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ján Vaščák, Filippo Cavallo, Paolo Dario, Laura Fiorini, Francesco Semeraro, Pitoyo Hartono, Marián Mach, Daniel Hládek, Liang Zhao and Xingfu Wang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Geocarto International, Sensors, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica and Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact