Peter Scherer

2.9k citations
55 papers · 2.4k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Scherer

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Peter Scherer
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Sensory Systems 421
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.2k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 118
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 90
  • Immunology and Allergy 80
Replace Donald F. Proctor with:
Donald F. Proctor United States
Julia S. Kimbell United States
Guilherme J. M. Garcia United States
David Elad Israel
G. Rettinger Germany
A. Jackson United States
Dennis O. Frank‐Ito United States
Yidan Shang Australia
Tilman Keck Germany
Keyvan Keyhani United States
Peter Scherer relative to Donald F. Proctor United States Donald F. Proctor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Donald F. Proctor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Scherer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Scherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Scherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Scherer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Scherer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Scherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Scherer. The network helps show where Peter Scherer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Scherer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Scherer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Scherer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995303
2 1993301
3 1997167
4 2005153
5 1975125
6 199475
7 197275
8 198672
9 200671
10 198271
11 199769
12 198066
13 199560
14 198256
15 198951
16 198747
17 199146
18 200744
19 198142
20 200739

About Peter Scherer

Peter Scherer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (31 papers), Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies (8 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (3 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (3 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (421 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (118 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (90 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (80 citations). Peter Scherer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Maxwell M. Mozell, Keyvan Keyhani, Intaek Hahn, Kai Zhao, Nicholas M. Greene, Lawrence H. Shendalman, Pamela Dalton, GLENN HESS, Arend Bouhuys and Gordon R. Neufeld. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Journal of Biomechanics and Chemical Senses.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact