Peter Roth

700 citations
9 papers · 590 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 6
    • Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions 2
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 1
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 1

Peter Roth

9 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Peter Roth
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 90
  • Inorganic Chemistry 342
  • Organic Chemistry 244
  • Signal Processing 81
  • Biomedical Engineering 176
Replace Chunhui Yan with:
Chunhui Yan China
Zhengyu Li China
Gargi Sengupta India
K.E. Larsen Denmark
Tianyi Liu China
Hyunji Kim South Korea
Richard J. Watkins United States
Valmor F. de Almeida United States
Yinpeng Wang China
Xing Yang China
Peter Roth relative to Chunhui Yan China Chunhui Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.7×
Chunhui Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Roth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Roth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Roth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Roth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Roth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Roth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Roth. The network helps show where Peter Roth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peter Roth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Roth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Roth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1971158
2 2004123
3 2001102
4 200092
5 200250
6 200232
7 200026
8 19955
9 20032

About Peter Roth

Peter Roth is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Signal Processing and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (6 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (4 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers), Surface Chemistry and Catalysis (2 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (1 paper), Digital Filter Design and Implementation (1 paper), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (90 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (342 citations), Organic Chemistry (244 citations), Signal Processing (81 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (176 citations). Peter Roth has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pher G. Andersson, Peter Brandt, Tibor Tarnai, Diego A. Alonso, Sofia Nordin, Marc Thommen, Peter Somfai, Jenny K. Ekegren, Klas Källström and Pedro Pinho. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Chemical Communications, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Chemistry - A European Journal and IEEE Spectrum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact