Peter Redmond

516 citations
19 papers · 373 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Redmond

18 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Peter Redmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 152
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 71
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 176
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 37
  • Mathematical Physics 20
Replace Mark D. Semon with:
Mark D. Semon United States
Sadataka Furui Japan
G. Wunner Germany
Yuri F. Orlov United States
Lewis P. Fulcher United States
Michel Vittot France
M. Lewkowicz Israel
W. V. Houston United States
Y. Srivastava United States
V. G. Morozov Russia
Peter Redmond relative to Mark D. Semon United States Mark D. Semon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark D. Semon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Redmond. The network helps show where Peter Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Redmond Line = papers co-authored together Peter Redmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 195872
2 196570
3 196442
4 195433
5 195831
6 198028
7 202225
8 196022
9 195618
10 196414
11 20124
12 20243
13 20243
14 20233
15 19592
16 20221
17
Electrostatically formed antennas
19791
18 19571
19 19590

About Peter Redmond

Peter Redmond is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (2 papers), Structural Analysis and Optimization (2 papers) and Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (152 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (71 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (176 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (37 citations) and Mathematical Physics (20 citations). Peter Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jack L. Uretsky, Tomás Ward, Maarten De Vos, Geraldine B. Boylan, Eoin Brophy, Muhammad Awais, Graham Healy, Joan Cahill, Gerard Lacey and Marco Cognetti. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition Technology & Work, Journal of Neural Engineering, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Annals of Physics and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact