Peter Poór

405 citations
30 papers · 280 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Poór

28 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Peter Poór
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 150
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 18
  • Management Information Systems 49
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 31
  • Strategy and Management 43
Replace R. Sudhakara Pandian with:
R. Sudhakara Pandian India
Victor Azamfirei Norway
Yuchen Jiang China
Branislav Mičieta Slovakia
Laura Cattaneo Italy
Michał Rogalewicz Poland
Agnieszka Kujawińska Poland
Ľuboslav Dulina Slovakia
Salla Lind Finland
Stefan Freiberger Germany
Peter Poór relative to R. Sudhakara Pandian India R. Sudhakara Pandian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
R. Sudhakara Pandian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Poór

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Poór's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Poór with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Poór more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Poór

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Poór. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Poór. The network helps show where Peter Poór may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Peter Poór, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Poór Line = papers co-authored together Peter Poór links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201949
2 202136
3
Historical Overview of Maintenance Management Strategies: Development from Breakdown Maintenance to Predictive Maintenance in Accordance with Four Industrial Revolutions
201930
4 201918
5 202416
6 201815
7 201412
8 201911
9 202010
10 202010
11 20229
12 20138
13 20207
14 20197
15 20197
16 20157
17 20175
18 20165
19 20203
20 20143

About Peter Poór

Peter Poór is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Mechanical Engineering and Management Information Systems, having authored 30 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Transformation in Industry (12 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (7 papers), Transport and Logistics Innovations (6 papers), Quality and Management Systems (5 papers), Surface Treatment and Coatings (4 papers), Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Business and Economic Development (2 papers) and Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (150 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (18 citations), Management Information Systems (49 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (31 citations) and Strategy and Management (43 citations). Peter Poór has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Josef Basl, M. Simon, Tamás Orosz, Pavel Karban, Anton Rassõlkin, David Pánek, Marek Kočiško, Liberios Vokorokos, Maja Trstenjak and Milan Edl. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Sustainability, Energies, MM Science Journal and Procedia Manufacturing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact