Peter Pockney
Impact in
-
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Surgery top 10%
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Surgical site infection prevention
- Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Stoma care and complications
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Brian Draganic (8 shared papers)R. Carroll (7 shared papers)John Attia (2 shared papers)Fiona Reid (2 shared papers)Rodney J. Scott (7 shared papers)Matthew D. Dun (2 shared papers)Shafaque Shaikh (1 shared paper)Patrick Zhan‐Yun Lim (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ANZ Journal of Surgery (9 papers)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (4 papers)British journal of surgery (3 papers)Journal of Surgical Research (3 papers)Journal of Pediatric Urology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Peter Pockney
42 papers receiving 645 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Oncology 162
- Surgery 256
- Gastroenterology 20
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 75
- Cancer Research 49
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Pockney
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Pockney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Pockney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Pockney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Pockney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Pockney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Pockney. The network helps show where Peter Pockney may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Pockney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 5 |
About Peter Pockney
Peter Pockney is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (162 citations), Surgery (256 citations), Gastroenterology (20 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (75 citations) and Cancer Research (49 citations). Peter Pockney has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Brian Draganic, R. Carroll, John Attia, Fiona Reid, Rodney J. Scott, Matthew D. Dun, Shafaque Shaikh, Patrick Zhan‐Yun Lim, Elizabeth Holliday and Paul Little. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, British journal of surgery, Journal of Surgical Research and Journal of Pediatric Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.