Peter Piot
Impact in
- Infectious Diseases top 0.5%
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
- Virology top 2%
- HIV Research and Treatment
Papers in
-
- HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions 25
-
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 15
- Co-authors
- Michael Bartoš (3 shared papers)Thomas C. Quinn (3 shared papers)Mark Dybul (8 shared papers)Bernhard Schwartländer (2 shared papers)Neff Walker (1 shared paper)Peter D. Ghys (1 shared paper)Robert Greener (1 shared paper)Sarah Russell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Lancet (11 papers)AIDS (6 papers)PLoS ONE (4 papers)Science (4 papers)Sexually Transmitted Diseases (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Piot
59 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Infectious Diseases 1.7k
- Virology 372
- General Health Professions 834
- Epidemiology 941
- Safety Research 166
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Piot
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Piot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Piot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Piot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Piot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Piot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Piot. The network helps show where Peter Piot may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Piot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 329 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 202 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 201 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 198 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 195 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 172 | |
| 7 | The interaction of HIV infection and other sexually transmitted diseases: an opportunity for intervention. | 1989 | 149 |
| 8 | 2014 | 136 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 128 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 120 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 117 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 116 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 107 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 102 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 99 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 95 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 90 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 90 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 88 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 82 |
About Peter Piot
Peter Piot is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 62 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (25 papers), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (18 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (15 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (9 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (8 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (5 papers) and Global Health and Surgery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (1.7k citations), Virology (372 citations), General Health Professions (834 citations), Epidemiology (941 citations) and Safety Research (166 citations). Peter Piot has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Bartoš, Thomas C. Quinn, Mark Dybul, Bernhard Schwartländer, Neff Walker, Peter D. Ghys, Robert Greener, Sarah Russell, Gabriela B. Gomez and Ana Wheelock. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, AIDS, PLoS ONE, Science and Sexually Transmitted Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.