Peter Ørbæk

608 citations
18 papers · 382 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Ørbæk

17 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Peter Ørbæk
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Human-Computer Interaction 96
  • Signal Processing 103
  • Artificial Intelligence 235
  • Information Systems 112
  • Computer Networks and Communications 94
Replace Serguei A. Mokhov with:
Serguei A. Mokhov Canada
Shi-Kuo Chang United States
Nabil Layaïda France
Mohammad Shirali-Shahreza Iran
Koji Torii Japan
R. Newman-Wolfe United States
Jo Devriendt Belgium
Jiaping Gui United States
Joachim Jansen Belgium
Günther Pfaff Germany
Peter Ørbæk relative to Serguei A. Mokhov Canada Serguei A. Mokhov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Serguei A. Mokhov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ørbæk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ørbæk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ørbæk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ørbæk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ørbæk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ørbæk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ørbæk. The network helps show where Peter Ørbæk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ørbæk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ørbæk Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ørbæk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199768
2
Trust in the-calculus
199567
3 200342
4 199940
5 200237
6
Relational Reasoning about Functions and Nondeterminism
199937
7
Interactive Room Support for Complex and Distributed Design Projects.
200119
8 200018
9 199518
10 199510
11 20036
12 19955
13 20054
14 20004
15
Trust and Dependence Analysis
19973
16 19943
17 20021
18 20030

About Peter Ørbæk

Peter Ørbæk is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Networks and Communications and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (7 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (4 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (3 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (3 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (2 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (2 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (96 citations), Signal Processing (103 citations), Artificial Intelligence (235 citations), Information Systems (112 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (94 citations). Peter Ørbæk has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jens Palsberg, Kaj Grønbæk, Lennert Sloth, Mette Agger Eriksen, Preben Mogensen, Olivier Danvy, Glynn Winskel, Søren B. Lassen, Torben Braüner and Jaap van Oosten. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Networks, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, Journal of Functional Programming, DAIMI Report Series and BRICS Report Series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact