Peter Ørbæk

611 citations
20 papers · 496 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Ørbæk

20 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Peter Ørbæk
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Human-Computer Interaction 112
  • Signal Processing 139
  • Artificial Intelligence 321
  • Information Systems 148
  • Software 23
Replace Beat Gfeller with:
Beat Gfeller Switzerland
Masakatsu Nishigaki Japan
Henry Carter United States
Vinod Anupam United States
Craig A. N. Soules United States
Shi-Kuo Chang United States
Bogdan Czejdo United States
Abbas K. Zaidi United States
Daniel C. Swinehart United States
Peter Ørbæk relative to Beat Gfeller Switzerland Beat Gfeller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Beat Gfeller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ørbæk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ørbæk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ørbæk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ørbæk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ørbæk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ørbæk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ørbæk. The network helps show where Peter Ørbæk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ørbæk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ørbæk Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ørbæk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199784
2
Trust in the-calculus
199578
3 200353
4
Relational Reasoning about Functions and Nondeterminism
199949
5 200245
6 199945
7 199523
8 200022
9 199420
10
Interactive Room Support for Complex and Distributed Design Projects.
200119
11 199512
12 199511
13 19957
14 20037
15 20056
16
Trust and Dependence Analysis
19974
17 20004
18 19943
19 20032
20 20022

About Peter Ørbæk

Peter Ørbæk is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Human-Computer Interaction and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 20 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (9 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (5 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (4 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (4 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (2 papers) and Geographic Information Systems Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (112 citations), Signal Processing (139 citations), Artificial Intelligence (321 citations), Information Systems (148 citations) and Software (23 citations). Peter Ørbæk has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jens Palsberg, Kaj Grønbæk, Mette Agger Eriksen, Lennert Sloth, Preben Mogensen, Olivier Danvy, Glynn Winskel, Torben Braüner, Jaap van Oosten and Søren B. Lassen. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Networks, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, Journal of Functional Programming, Lecture notes in computer science and International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact