Peter N. Arrowsmith

729 citations
11 papers · 505 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter N. Arrowsmith

11 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Peter N. Arrowsmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Ophthalmology 334
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 469
  • Epidemiology 222
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 115
  • Anatomy 1
Replace Michael R. Deitz with:
Michael R. Deitz United States
John A van Westenbrugge United States
Richard A Villaseñor United States
Lee T. Nordan United States
Andrew W. Lyle United States
Yoshiko Hori-Komai Japan
Kátia Mantovani Bottós Brazil
Karim Rasheed United States
Lurdes Belda‐Salmerón Spain
Monika Landesz Netherlands
Peter N. Arrowsmith relative to Michael R. Deitz United States Michael R. Deitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael R. Deitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter N. Arrowsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter N. Arrowsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter N. Arrowsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter N. Arrowsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter N. Arrowsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter N. Arrowsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter N. Arrowsmith. The network helps show where Peter N. Arrowsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter N. Arrowsmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter N. Arrowsmith Line = papers co-authored together Peter N. Arrowsmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2007132
2 198376
3 198951
4 198440
5 198839
6 198536
7 198434
8 198729
9 198629
10 198726
11 198813

About Peter N. Arrowsmith

Peter N. Arrowsmith is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 11 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (11 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (334 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (469 citations), Epidemiology (222 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (115 citations) and Anatomy (1 citation). Peter N. Arrowsmith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald G. Marks, Donald R. Sanders, Maurice E. John, Robert K. Maloney, Kerry K. Assil, R. Doyle Stulting, Vance Thompson, Buddy Russell, Beth E. Meyerowitz and Maureen K. Powers. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, Journal of Refractive Surgery and Archives of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact