Peter M. Parten

1.3k citations
8 papers · 910 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Surgery top 2%
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
    • Trauma Management and Diagnosis
    • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries

Papers in

    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 6
    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 2
    • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries 3

Peter M. Parten

8 papers receiving 871 citations

Peers

Peter M. Parten
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Surgery 855
  • Epidemiology 451
  • Rehabilitation 13
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 16
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 31
Replace Chisato Watanabe with:
Chisato Watanabe Japan
J.P. Iannotti United States
Joshua A. Greenspoon United States
CDR Matthew T. Provencher United States
Xavier A. Duralde United States
C. Nérot France
Petar Golijanin United States
Kirk L. Jensen United States
A.D. Patel United Kingdom
Bryan Wall United States
Peter M. Parten relative to Chisato Watanabe Japan Chisato Watanabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chisato Watanabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Parten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Parten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Parten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Parten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Parten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Parten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Parten. The network helps show where Peter M. Parten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. Parten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter M. Parten Line = papers co-authored together Peter M. Parten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2004318
2 2002308
3 200379
4 200476
5 201466
6 201444
7 200114
8 20025

About Peter M. Parten

Peter M. Parten is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Communication, having authored 8 papers that have together received 910 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (6 papers), Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (3 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (855 citations), Epidemiology (451 citations), Rehabilitation (13 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (16 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (31 citations). Peter M. Parten has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen S. Burkhart, Ian K.Y. Lo, Armin M. Tehrany, Christopher R. Adams, Pablo Narbona, Paul C. Brady, David P. Huberty, Paolo Arrigoni, Robert U. Hartzler and Patrick J. Denard. Their work appears in journals such as Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery and Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact