Peter Lenk
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Turtle Biology and Conservation
Papers in
- Genetics 6
- Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy 2
- Genetic diversity and population structure 2
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities 1
- Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting 1
-
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology 5
- Co-authors
- Michaël Wink (9 shared papers)Ulrich Joger (8 shared papers)Uwe Fritz (4 shared papers)Daniela Guicking (3 shared papers)Sandro Tripepi (1 shared paper)Maria Grazia Pennisi (1 shared paper)Antoine Cadi (1 shared paper)Nikolai L. Orlov (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Amphibia-Reptilia (4 papers)Molecular Ecology (2 papers)Zoologica Scripta (1 paper)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (1 paper)Current Herpetology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyRussiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Lenk
10 papers receiving 486 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Ecological Modeling 103
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 226
- Global and Planetary Change 326
- Genetics 303
- Virology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lenk
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lenk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lenk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lenk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lenk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lenk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lenk. The network helps show where Peter Lenk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lenk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 163 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 121 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 105 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 40 | |
| 5 | When turtle distribution tells European history: mtDNA haplotypes of Emys orbicularis reflect in Germany former division by the Iron Curtain | 2004 | 34 |
| 6 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 12 |
About Peter Lenk
Peter Lenk is a scholar working on Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (5 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (4 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (2 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (2 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Insect Utilization and Effects (1 paper) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (103 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (226 citations), Global and Planetary Change (326 citations), Genetics (303 citations) and Virology (33 citations). Peter Lenk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michaël Wink, Ulrich Joger, Uwe Fritz, Daniela Guicking, Sandro Tripepi, Maria Grazia Pennisi, Antoine Cadi, Nikolai L. Orlov, Bryan L. Stuart and Élisabeth Rosecchi. Their work appears in journals such as Amphibia-Reptilia, Molecular Ecology, Zoologica Scripta, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and Current Herpetology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.