Peter Leech

514 citations
11 papers · 371 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Leech

10 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

Peter Leech
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 63
  • Plant Science 190
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 73
  • Soil Science 31
  • Insect Science 32
Replace Andrew Krohn with:
Andrew Krohn United States
Francisco Javier Silva Pando Spain
Harrison Hughes United States
Anabela D. F. Belo Portugal
William D. Eaton United States
Eva Boon Canada
Corey V. Ransom United States
Charlotte Poeydebat France
Sarah R. Carrino‐Kyker United States
Caroline Brunel France
Peter Leech relative to Andrew Krohn United States Andrew Krohn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew Krohn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Leech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Leech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Leech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Leech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Leech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Leech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Leech. The network helps show where Peter Leech may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Peter Leech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Leech Line = papers co-authored together Peter Leech links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1993357
2
‘In Paradise and among Angels’: Music and Musicians at St Omers English Jesuit College, 1593–1721
20115
3 20012
4 19961
5 19871
6 20111
7
The SUNDIAL model
20041
8 20171
9 20031
10 19791
11
Clamores omnino atque admirationes excitant: New light on music and musicians at St Omers English Jesuit College, 1658-1714
20160

About Peter Leech

Peter Leech is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Urban Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper), Early Modern Women Writers (1 paper), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper), Diverse Musicological Studies (1 paper) and Public Spaces through Art (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (63 citations), Plant Science (190 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (73 citations), Soil Science (31 citations) and Insect Science (32 citations). Peter Leech has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and China. Frequent co-authors include Ronald P. White, S A Harding, P. W. Lane, R. W. Payne, Graeme Morgan, R. Thompson, P. G. N. Digby, G. Tunnicliffe Wilson, S. J. Welham and Denise Reid. Their work appears in journals such as Early Music, Journal of Jesuit Studies, Assistive Technology, Journal of Visual Culture and The British Journal of Aesthetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact