Peter J. Thomas

96 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Peter J. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 853
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 413
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 386
  • Archeology 15
  • Human-Computer Interaction 60
Replace Joseph T. Lizier with:
Joseph T. Lizier Australia
Gordon Pipa Germany
Sharon Crook United States
Viola Priesemann Germany
Vladimir Maksimenko Russia
Richard H. R. Hahnloser Switzerland
Sonja Grün Germany
Giovanni Petri Italy
Hideyuki Suzuki Japan
Christoph von der Malsburg Germany
Peter J. Thomas relative to Joseph T. Lizier Australia Joseph T. Lizier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joseph T. Lizier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Thomas. The network helps show where Peter J. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001251
2 2002156
3 2004126
4 1998126
5 199476
6 200272
7 200864
8 201950
9 201148
10 200944
11 201437
12 201637
13 201234
14 201432
15 201931
16 201631
17 199731
18 200129
19
The Diffusion-Limited Biochemical Signal-Relay Channel
200327
20 201427

About Peter J. Thomas

Peter J. Thomas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computer Networks and Communications, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (36 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (23 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (14 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (6 papers) and Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (853 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (413 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (386 citations), Archeology (15 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (60 citations). Peter J. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jack D. Cowan, Paul C. Bressloff, Martin Golubitsky, Matthew C. Wiener, Terrence J. Sejnowski, Jean‐Marc Fellous, Benjamin Lindner, Paul Tiesinga, John Milton and John D. Hunter. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Cybernetics, Journal of Mathematical Biology, Neural Computation, Journal of Computational Neuroscience and PLoS Computational Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact