Peter J. de Groot

6.0k citations
147 papers · 4.2k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. de Groot

142 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Peter J. de Groot
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.4k
  • Computational Mechanics 1.3k
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.7k
  • Instrumentation 158
  • Media Technology 378
Replace P. Hariharan with:
P. Hariharan India
Ichirou Yamaguchi Japan
Jürgen Czarske Germany
Małgorzata Kujawińska Poland
Werner Jüptner Germany
Cuifang Kuang China
Daniel Malacara Mexico
Eusebio Bernabéu Spain
Andrea Fińizio Italy
Michael G. Somekh United Kingdom
Peter J. de Groot relative to P. Hariharan India P. Hariharan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
P. Hariharan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. de Groot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. de Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. de Groot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. de Groot. The network helps show where Peter J. de Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. de Groot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. de Groot Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. de Groot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995309
2 1994288
3 2015271
4 1995183
5 2000159
6 1988158
7 2002153
8 1995145
9 1994137
10 2004115
11 2003108
12 2010106
13 200190
14 201970
15 199466
16 201466
17 199164
18 200458
19 199555
20 202151

About Peter J. de Groot

Peter J. de Groot is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 147 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical measurement and interference techniques (87 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (69 papers), Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (61 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (18 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (13 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (13 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (13 papers) and Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2.4k citations), Computational Mechanics (1.3k citations), Mechanical Engineering (1.7k citations), Instrumentation (158 citations) and Media Technology (378 citations). Peter J. de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include L. Deck, Xavier Colonna de Lega, Gregg M. Gallatin, Mohamed A. Ghanem, Philip N. Bartlett, S.H. Macomber, G. T. Reid, David Robinson, A. A. Zhukov and Richard Leach. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Optical Engineering, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vision Research and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact