Peter J. Beck

86 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers

Peter J. Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 175
  • Ecology 311
  • Sociology and Political Science 374
  • Gender Studies 53
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
Replace Christopher C. Joyner with:
Christopher C. Joyner United States
Hal K. Rothman United States
Anne Cadoret France
Mark David Spence United States
Rachael Squire United Kingdom
Mark Aldrich United States
Lotte Hughes United Kingdom
Christy Collis Australia
Mathias Thaler United Kingdom
Tina Loo Canada
Peter J. Beck relative to Christopher C. Joyner United States Christopher C. Joyner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.7×
Christopher C. Joyner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Beck. The network helps show where Peter J. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Beck Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The international politics of Antarctica
198671
2 201337
3 202226
4 199023
5 200621
6 198420
7 199416
8 198914
9 198513
10 200312
11 198511
12 200011
13 199011
14 200811
15 201311
16 200511
17 198710
18 198610
19 19829
20 19939

About Peter J. Beck

Peter J. Beck is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Political Science and International Relations and Gender Studies, having authored 97 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polar Research and Ecology (40 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (34 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (25 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (15 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (14 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (6 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (5 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (175 citations), Ecology (311 citations), Sociology and Political Science (374 citations), Gender Studies (53 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations). Peter J. Beck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sujee Jeyapalina, Roy D. Bloebaum, Kent N. Bachus, Sara Seager, David Grinspoon, Doug Sinclair, Darrel Baumgardner, Richard Hunter, Janusz J. Petkowski and Christopher E. Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Polar Record, International Affairs, Soccer and Society, Sport in History and The English Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact