Peter How
Impact in
- Oncology top 5%
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
-
- MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Brendan John Moran (6 shared papers)Gina M. Brown (8 shared papers)Philip Quirke (5 shared papers)Paris P Tekkis (3 shared papers)Sigmar Stelzner (3 shared papers)Graham Branagan (3 shared papers)Nicholas Paul West (3 shared papers)Richard J. Heald (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Colorectal Disease (2 papers)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (2 papers)Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England (1 paper)Annals of Surgery (1 paper)Annals of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanySweden
In The Last Decade
Peter How
14 papers receiving 544 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Oncology 491
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 31
- Rheumatology 15
- Surgery 34
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 1
Countries citing papers authored by Peter How
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter How's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter How with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter How more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter How
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter How. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter How. The network helps show where Peter How may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter How, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 251 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 12 | Delayed ileal perforation secondary to traumatic stricture presenting as pyrexia of unknown origin. | 2009 | 2 |
| 13 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 14 | The MERCURY II Study: Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Assessment System Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model | 2016 | 1 |
About Peter How
Peter How is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Neurology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (9 papers), Vascular anomalies and interventions (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (1 paper), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (1 paper), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (1 paper), Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (491 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (31 citations), Rheumatology (15 citations), Surgery (34 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (1 citation). Peter How has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Brendan John Moran, Gina M. Brown, Philip Quirke, Paris P Tekkis, Sigmar Stelzner, Graham Branagan, Nicholas Paul West, Richard J. Heald, Oliver C. Shihab and Bill Heald. Their work appears in journals such as Colorectal Disease, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Annals of Surgery and Annals of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.