Peter How
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Brendan Moran (6 shared papers)Gina Brown (8 shared papers)Philip Quirke (5 shared papers)Sigmar Stelzner (3 shared papers)Graham Branagan (3 shared papers)Paris Tekkis (3 shared papers)Nicholas P. West (3 shared papers)Richard J. Heald (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (2 papers)Colorectal Disease (2 papers)Techniques in Coloproctology (1 paper)Surgical Oncology (1 paper)European Journal of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter How
13 papers receiving 460 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Oncology 436
- Surgery 377
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 56
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 69
- Rheumatology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Peter How
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter How's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter How with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter How more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter How
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter How. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter How. The network helps show where Peter How may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter How, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 74 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 12 | Delayed ileal perforation secondary to traumatic stricture presenting as pyrexia of unknown origin. | 2009 | 2 |
| 13 | The MERCURY II Study: Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Assessment System Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model | 2016 | 1 |
About Peter How
Peter How is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 13 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (9 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (5 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (436 citations), Surgery (377 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (56 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (69 citations) and Rheumatology (28 citations). Peter How has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Brendan Moran, Gina Brown, Philip Quirke, Sigmar Stelzner, Graham Branagan, Paris Tekkis, Nicholas P. West, Richard J. Heald, Oliver C. Shihab and Bill Heald. Their work appears in journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Colorectal Disease, Techniques in Coloproctology, Surgical Oncology and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.