Peter Hogg

2.8k citations
202 papers · 2.0k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Hogg

195 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Peter Hogg
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 811
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 525
  • Health Information Management 47
  • Radiation 70
  • Oncology 180
Replace Steven E. Seltzer with:
Steven E. Seltzer United States
Michael J. Wallace United States
Barbara Monsees United States
Daniel Kim United States
Christopher Rao United Kingdom
Paul J. Chang United States
Mohammed Keshtgar United Kingdom
Seung‐Whan Lee South Korea
Lars J. Grimm United States
Susannah Jacob Australia
Peter Hogg relative to Steven E. Seltzer United States Steven E. Seltzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Steven E. Seltzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hogg. The network helps show where Peter Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hogg Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hogg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 202 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006167
2 201358
3 200349
4 200346
5 201643
6 201336
7 201535
8 201434
9 201133
10 201731
11 201330
12 201128
13 201826
14 201926
15 201926
16 201826
17 200325
18 200723
19 201722
20 201822

About Peter Hogg

Peter Hogg is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 202 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (54 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (48 papers), Radiology practices and education (45 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (26 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (16 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (11 papers) and AI in cancer detection (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (811 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (525 citations), Health Information Management (47 citations), Radiation (70 citations) and Oncology (180 citations). Peter Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Leslie Robinson, Andrew England, Julie Nightingale, Guoping Yan, Claire Mercer, Mark F. McEntee, Erika Denton, David Manning, Tina Gambling and John D. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Radiology, Radiography, Medical Physics, European Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact