Peter Hamer

38 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Peter Hamer
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 680
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 215
  • Rehabilitation 120
  • Occupational Therapy 70
  • Gastroenterology 47
Replace David R. Pearson with:
David R. Pearson United States
Helen Carter United Kingdom
Kris Berg United States
Paul G. Montgomery Australia
M Wunderlich Austria
D Harriss United Kingdom
Rafael Merino-Marbán Spain
Christer Malm Sweden
Emma Beckman Australia
Deniz Evcik Türkiye
Peter Hamer relative to David R. Pearson United States David R. Pearson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
David R. Pearson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hamer. The network helps show where Peter Hamer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hamer Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hamer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002249
2 2008178
3
The Nominal Group Technique: A useful concensus methodology in physiotherapy research
2004122
4 2000118
5 201296
6 200394
7 200689
8 200782
9 200253
10 200552
11 200851
12 200948
13 201447
14 200941
15 200640
16 201637
17 200435
18 200333
19 201027
20 201317

About Peter Hamer

Peter Hamer is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports injuries and prevention (9 papers), Sports Performance and Training (9 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (4 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (4 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (3 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (680 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (215 citations), Rehabilitation (120 citations), Occupational Therapy (70 citations) and Gastroenterology (47 citations). Peter Hamer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Serbia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Bishop, Alberto Méndez-Villanueva, Sandy Gordon, Miranda D. Grounds, Michael J. Davies, Mark Stevenson, Caroline F. Finch, Margaret A. Potter, Bruce Elliott and Marcie‐jo Kresnow. Their work appears in journals such as ANZ Journal of Surgery, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, British Journal of Sports Medicine and Journal of science and medicine in sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact