Peter G. Moore

83 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

Peter G. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 61
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 53
  • Developmental Neuroscience 40
  • Emergency Medicine 83
  • General Decision Sciences 17
Replace R. W. Patterson with:
R. W. Patterson United States
Michael Ackerman United States
Francisco M. González United States
David Cook Australia
Andrew E. Williams United States
James E. Davis United States
William C. Black United States
Michael Burns United States
Warren S. Sandberg United States
Kenneth I. Shine United States
Peter G. Moore relative to R. W. Patterson United States R. W. Patterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
R. W. Patterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter G. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter G. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter G. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter G. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter G. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter G. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter G. Moore. The network helps show where Peter G. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter G. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter G. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Peter G. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200461
2 201359
3 197758
4 198656
5 196849
6 199239
7 198138
8 198333
9 197628
10 199622
11 197721
12 197620
13 199619
14 195719
15 198917
16 198616
17 200216
18 199715
19 201115
20 199114

About Peter G. Moore

Peter G. Moore is a scholar working on Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 88 papers that have together received 942 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (7 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers), Census and Population Estimation (3 papers) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (61 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (53 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (40 citations), Emergency Medicine (83 citations) and General Decision Sciences (17 citations). Peter G. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include O.F.W. James, Nguyen Duc Kien, Hong Liu, Ann Bolcavage, A. Feuerstein, Nilas Young, Rory S. Jaffe, Zhongmin Li, Fuhai Ji and John A. Reitan. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society), Postgraduate Medical Journal and Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact