Peter DeBry

647 citations
12 papers · 529 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter DeBry

10 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers

Peter DeBry
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Ophthalmology 318
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 108
  • Oncology 58
  • Cell Biology 30
  • Health Information Management 8
Replace Jingxue Ma with:
Jingxue Ma China
June Lee South Korea
Amol D. Kulkarni United States
Maya Bitar United States
Dan-dan Zhou China
Yang Ding China
Y Zhang China
Joyce Huang United States
Robert Laibovitz United States
Peter DeBry relative to Jingxue Ma China Jingxue Ma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Jingxue Ma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter DeBry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter DeBry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter DeBry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter DeBry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter DeBry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter DeBry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter DeBry. The network helps show where Peter DeBry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter DeBry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter DeBry Line = papers co-authored together Peter DeBry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2002295
2 1997122
3 199858
4 200519
5 200113
6 20069
7 19987
8 20023
9
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
20032
10 20001
11 20000
12 20060

About Peter DeBry

Peter DeBry is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 12 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper) and Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (318 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (108 citations), Oncology (58 citations), Cell Biology (30 citations) and Health Information Management (8 citations). Peter DeBry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Deborah W. Neklason, James E. Metherall, Alan S. Crandall, Randall J. Olson, Rohit Krishna, Richard P. Golden, Randall J. Olson, Mark J. Lucarelli, R. Hari Krishna and T. Lee Willoughby. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Glaucoma, Optometry and Vision Science, Cornea and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact