Peter de Looff

685 citations
20 papers · 452 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter de Looff

20 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Peter de Looff
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Applied Psychology 57
  • Clinical Psychology 177
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • Social Psychology 101
  • Leadership and Management 6
Replace Benjamin Trachik with:
Benjamin Trachik United States
Karin S. Nijhof Netherlands
Jamie R. Pogue United States
Andrew Levihn‐Coon United States
Jangho Park South Korea
Judith Esi van der Zwan Netherlands
Jong-Sun Lee South Korea
Heather Mason United Kingdom
Justin MacKenzie United States
Raquel Gonçalves Brazil
Peter de Looff relative to Benjamin Trachik United States Benjamin Trachik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Benjamin Trachik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter de Looff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter de Looff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter de Looff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter de Looff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter de Looff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter de Looff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter de Looff. The network helps show where Peter de Looff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter de Looff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter de Looff Line = papers co-authored together Peter de Looff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2020132
2 201852
3 202049
4 201848
5 201843
6 201942
7 202138
8 202110
9 20227
10 20227
11 20215
12 20204
13 20233
14 20213
15 20242
16 20232
17 20222
18 20241
19
Watch It!; a Study into the Associations between Skin Conductance and Aggressive Behavior
20141
20 20141

About Peter de Looff

Peter de Looff is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 20 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (57 citations), Clinical Psychology (177 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations), Social Psychology (101 citations) and Leadership and Management (6 citations). Peter de Looff has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henk Nijman, P.J.C.M. Embregts, Robert Didden, Roy Otten, Arne Popma, Karin S. Nijhof, Ron H. J. Scholte, Liza J. M. Cornet, Matthijs L. Noordzij and Mirjam Moerbeek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders and Journal of Medical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact