Peter de Heus
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Stress and Burnout Research
Papers in
-
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 2
- Co-authors
- René F. W. Diekstra (3 shared papers)Nadia Garnefski (1 shared paper)Eric van Dijk (1 shared paper)Gieta van der Pompe (1 shared paper)Brigit M. van Widenfelt (1 shared paper)David A. Heyne (1 shared paper)Marija Marić (1 shared paper)P. Michiel Westenberg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Anxiety Stress & Coping (1 paper)Self and Identity (1 paper)Personality and Social Psychology Review (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Personality Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSerbiaBelgium
In The Last Decade
Peter de Heus
11 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 150
- Social Psychology 97
- Safety Research 35
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 37
- General Decision Sciences 6
Countries citing papers authored by Peter de Heus
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter de Heus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter de Heus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter de Heus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter de Heus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter de Heus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter de Heus. The network helps show where Peter de Heus may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Peter de Heus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 114 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 9 | Werken onder druk : een onderzoek naar omvang en factoren van werkstress in Nederland | 1994 | 5 |
| 10 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 2 |
About Peter de Heus
Peter de Heus is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (150 citations), Social Psychology (97 citations), Safety Research (35 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (37 citations) and General Decision Sciences (6 citations). Peter de Heus has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Serbia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include René F. W. Diekstra, Nadia Garnefski, Eric van Dijk, Gieta van der Pompe, Brigit M. van Widenfelt, David A. Heyne, Marija Marić, P. Michiel Westenberg, Elisabeth H.M. Eurelings-Bontekoe and Arno van Dam. Their work appears in journals such as Anxiety Stress & Coping, Self and Identity, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Journal of Personality Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.