Péter Csontos

77 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

Péter Csontos
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 284
  • Plant Science 437
  • Ecological Modeling 47
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 193
  • Insect Science 105
Replace Daniela Ciccarelli with:
Daniela Ciccarelli Italy
Adel Jalili Iran
Mark A. Tobler United States
Anne Bousquet‐Mélou France
Gisela C. Stotz Chile
Sanjay Gairola United Arab Emirates
Kamariah Abu Salim Brunei
Stéphane Greff France
Juan José Cantero Argentina
M. Socorro González‐Elizondo Mexico
Péter Csontos relative to Daniela Ciccarelli Italy Daniela Ciccarelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Daniela Ciccarelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Csontos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Csontos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Csontos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Csontos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Csontos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Csontos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Csontos. The network helps show where Péter Csontos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Péter Csontos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Csontos Line = papers co-authored together Péter Csontos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201657
2 200754
3 201053
4 200346
5 201938
6
Reproductive potential of the alien species Asclepias Syriaca (Asclepiadaceae) in the rural landscape
200934
7 200933
8 200831
9 199726
10 201726
11 200123
12 201422
13
Seed bank of Pinus nigra plantations in dolomite rock grassland habitats, and its implications for restoring grassland vegetation.
199620
14 201920
15 199818
16 201718
17 201518
18 200617
19 201817
20 202117

About Péter Csontos

Péter Csontos is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Soil Science, having authored 82 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (33 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers), Forest ecology and management (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (284 citations), Plant Science (437 citations), Ecological Modeling (47 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (193 citations) and Insect Science (105 citations). Péter Csontos has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tibor Kalapos, Imre Cseresnyés, János Podani, Levente Kiss, Ágnes M. Móricz, Péter G. Ott, András Darcsi, Dániel Krüzselyi, Zoltán Barina and Szabolcs Béni. Their work appears in journals such as Community Ecology, Seed Science Research, Agronomy, Journal of Chromatography A and Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact