Pete Nowak

445 citations
19 papers · 299 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Pete Nowak

17 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers

Pete Nowak
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91
  • Environmental Chemistry 61
  • Soil Science 43
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 30
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 31
Replace Hugh Raven with:
Hugh Raven Netherlands
S. Dabbert Germany
Jerzy Bieńkowski Poland
J. Riley United Kingdom
Jonathan R. Winsten United States
Pierre Chopin Guadeloupe
K. Kareemulla India
T.J. de Koeijer Netherlands
George Boody United States
H.C. van Latesteijn Netherlands
Pete Nowak relative to Hugh Raven Netherlands Hugh Raven's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hugh Raven · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pete Nowak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pete Nowak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pete Nowak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pete Nowak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pete Nowak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pete Nowak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pete Nowak. The network helps show where Pete Nowak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Pete Nowak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pete Nowak Line = papers co-authored together Pete Nowak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Why farmers adopt production technology Overcoming impediments to adoption of crop residue management techniques will be crucial to implementation of conservation compliance plans
199274
2 200664
3 200641
4 200429
5 199218
6 200912
7 200511
8 19989
9 20138
10 20066
11 20096
12 20065
13 19924
14 19874
15 20113
16 19922
17 20122
18 19891
19
The Relationship Between Farm Size and Environmental Performance
20060

About Pete Nowak

Pete Nowak is a scholar working on Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers), Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (2 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (91 citations), Environmental Chemistry (61 citations), Soil Science (43 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (30 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (31 citations). Pete Nowak has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Bowen, Chris M. Boerboom, Edward C. Luschei, K. G. Karthikeyan and Francis J. Pierce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Weed Technology, Transactions of the ASABE, Society & Natural Resources and Journal of Environmental Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact