Peta Stapleton

101 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Peta Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Research and Theory 57
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 303
  • Clinical Psychology 510
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 208
  • Applied Psychology 66
Replace Linda Cooper with:
Linda Cooper United States
Sarah J. Fogarty Australia
Emese Csipke United Kingdom
Sau Fong Leung Hong Kong
Jeffrey E. Barnett United States
Elizabeth Pommier United States
Keith R. Aronson United States
Nicholas Kuzik Canada
Siobhan O’Dwyer Australia
Ineke Vergeer Australia
Peta Stapleton relative to Linda Cooper United States Linda Cooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Linda Cooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peta Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peta Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peta Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peta Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peta Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peta Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peta Stapleton. The network helps show where Peta Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peta Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peta Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together Peta Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014125
2 2017117
3 200979
4 201965
5 202056
6 202242
7 201838
8 201135
9 201434
10 201430
11 202030
12 200729
13 201828
14 201527
15 201627
16 201727
17
The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Emotional Freedom Techniques in Reducing Depression and Anxiety Among Adults: A Pilot Study.
201624
18 202224
19 201223
20 201822

About Peta Stapleton

Peta Stapleton is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacy, having authored 108 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (30 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (29 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (16 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (13 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (11 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (9 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (8 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (57 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (303 citations), Clinical Psychology (510 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (208 citations) and Applied Psychology (66 citations). Peta Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Dawson Church, Hannah Chatwin, Amy Jean Bannatyne, Aileen M. Pidgeon, Barbara C. Y. Lo, Debra Kay Creedy, Amanda Jane Henderson, Rebecca Sims, Oliver Baumann and Emma Eaton. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Australian Psychologist, Eating Disorders, Heliyon and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact