Peg Howland

915 citations
11 papers · 733 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peg Howland

10 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

Peg Howland
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 477
  • Computational Mathematics 9
  • Signal Processing 128
  • Media Technology 89
  • Analytical Chemistry 92
Replace Yingkang Hu with:
Yingkang Hu United States
Su‐Yun Huang Taiwan
Sandro Vega-Pons Cuba
Xiaosheng Zhuang Hong Kong
Julia Neumann Germany
Dongxia Chang China
G. Krishna India
Ali Çivril United States
Luis Rademacher United States
Peg Howland relative to Yingkang Hu United States Yingkang Hu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Yingkang Hu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peg Howland

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peg Howland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peg Howland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peg Howland more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peg Howland

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peg Howland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peg Howland. The network helps show where Peg Howland may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peg Howland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peg Howland Line = papers co-authored together Peg Howland links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2004288
2
Dimension Reduction in Text Classification with Support Vector Machines
2005172
3 2003144
4 200596
5 200414
6 20066
7 20045
8
Extension of Discriminant Analysis based on the Generalized Singular Value Decomposition
20024
9 20073
10
Dimension Reduction for Text Data Representation Based on Cluster Structure Preserving Projection
20011
11
Text Classification using Support Vector Machines with Dimension Reduction
20030

About Peg Howland

Peg Howland is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Analytical Chemistry, Statistics and Probability and Signal Processing, having authored 11 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face and Expression Recognition (8 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (5 papers), Text and Document Classification Technologies (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (1 paper) and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (477 citations), Computational Mathematics (9 citations), Signal Processing (128 citations), Media Technology (89 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (92 citations). Peg Howland has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Haesun Park, H. Park, Hyunsoo Kim, Moongu Jeon, Jianlin Wang and Todd Munson. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Pattern Recognition, Journal of Machine Learning Research, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence and University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact