Paul R. Yoder

43 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Paul R. Yoder
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ophthalmology 179
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 167
  • Instrumentation 17
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 131
  • Epidemiology 142
Replace Daniel Malacara-Hernández with:
Daniel Malacara-Hernández Mexico
Jorge Ares Spain
Paul Bierden United States
Vyas Akondi India
José A. Gómez‐Pedrero Spain
Sug-Whan Kim South Korea
Zacarías Malacara Mexico
Zhishan Gao China
Davies William de Lima Monteiro Brazil
Rong Sun United States
Paul R. Yoder relative to Daniel Malacara-Hernández Mexico Daniel Malacara-Hernández's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Daniel Malacara-Hernández · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul R. Yoder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul R. Yoder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul R. Yoder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul R. Yoder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul R. Yoder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul R. Yoder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul R. Yoder. The network helps show where Paul R. Yoder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Paul R. Yoder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul R. Yoder Line = papers co-authored together Paul R. Yoder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002156
2 1993125
3 200862
4 197542
5 195833
6 200018
7 198117
8 200014
9
Optical System Design, Second Edition
200811
10 199510
11 19638
12
Optomechanical Engineering and Vibration Control
19998
13 20157
14 19575
15 19894
16 19894
17 19924
18 19713
19 19533
20 19933

About Paul R. Yoder

Paul R. Yoder is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Ophthalmology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (11 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (8 papers), Advanced optical system design (8 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (5 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (5 papers), Laser Design and Applications (4 papers) and Optical measurement and interference techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (179 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (167 citations), Instrumentation (17 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (131 citations) and Epidemiology (142 citations). Paul R. Yoder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Edward R. Schlesinger, Daniel Vukobratovich, Hanna J. Hoffman, Robert E. Nordquist, Richard A. Eiferman, Simon Hauser, J. W. Warner, L. S. Smith, Carl Zweben and Colin G. Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, Journal of Refractive Surgery, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact