Paul E. Wehr

1.3k citations
29 papers · 756 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Paul E. Wehr

22 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

Paul E. Wehr
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • General Decision Sciences 95
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 29
  • Applied Psychology 92
  • Public Administration 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 338
Replace Ilse Cornelis with:
Ilse Cornelis Belgium
Keren Sharvit Israel
Marina Chernikova United States
Georges Schadron France
John Weston Howard United States
Frank R. Westie United States
Noel W. Smith United States
Shai Davidai United States
Douglas R. Oxley United States
Erin P. Hennes United States
Paul E. Wehr relative to Ilse Cornelis Belgium Ilse Cornelis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.4×
Ilse Cornelis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul E. Wehr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul E. Wehr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul E. Wehr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul E. Wehr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul E. Wehr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul E. Wehr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul E. Wehr. The network helps show where Paul E. Wehr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Paul E. Wehr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul E. Wehr Line = papers co-authored together Paul E. Wehr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006207
2 1991126
3 199868
4 197058
5 199857
6 200348
7 200148
8 200247
9 199432
10 197824
11 19868
12 20017
13 19965
14 19685
15 19953
16 19943
17 19782
18 19842
19 20192
20 20191

About Paul E. Wehr

Paul E. Wehr is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (3 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (3 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers), Sociology and Norbert Elias (2 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (2 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (2 papers) and Peace and Human Rights Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (95 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (29 citations), Applied Psychology (92 citations), Public Administration (27 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (338 citations). Paul E. Wehr has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include John Paul Lederach, Taiki Takahashi, James V. Downton, Yu Ohmura, Otomar J. Bartos, James C. Hannon, Gale E. Miller, Robert L. Crain, Elihu Katz and Delroy L. Paulhus. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Peace Research, Sociological Inquiry, American Sociological Review and Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact