Paul E. Schoch

54 papers receiving 855 citations

Peers

Paul E. Schoch
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Endocrinology 171
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 119
  • Molecular Medicine 83
  • Emergency Medical Services 67
  • Clinical Biochemistry 62
Replace Anita K. Highsmith with:
Anita K. Highsmith United States
R.C. Spencer United Kingdom
Heinrich K. Geiss Germany
Walter W. Bond United States
G Ducel Switzerland
Sydney Selwyn United Kingdom
Michael Noble Canada
H. Ludlam United Kingdom
Helen Dedier Canada
Narelle George Australia
Paul E. Schoch relative to Anita K. Highsmith United States Anita K. Highsmith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anita K. Highsmith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul E. Schoch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul E. Schoch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul E. Schoch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul E. Schoch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul E. Schoch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul E. Schoch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul E. Schoch. The network helps show where Paul E. Schoch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul E. Schoch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul E. Schoch Line = papers co-authored together Paul E. Schoch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989121
2 1997103
3 200172
4 198860
5 200059
6 199044
7 197541
8 199732
9 198629
10 198822
11 199222
12 199219
13 200919
14 198718
15 199818
16 198716
17 201215
18 199015
19 199215
20 197414

About Paul E. Schoch

Paul E. Schoch is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Endocrinology, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Plant Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 920 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infections and bacterial resistance (9 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (9 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (8 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (7 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (5 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (5 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (5 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (171 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (119 citations), Molecular Medicine (83 citations), Emergency Medical Services (67 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (62 citations). Paul E. Schoch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Burke A. Cunha, B. A. Cunha, Philip Domenico, Inge Gurevich, Alan M. Fein, Michael S. Niederman, Richard J. Salo, Kenneth Van Horn, Lucilla Baldassarri and Masanori Sasatsu. Their work appears in journals such as Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Heart & Lung, Journal of Hospital Infection, American Journal of Infection Control and European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact