Paul Bourke

492 citations
24 papers · 382 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Bourke

20 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Paul Bourke
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 89
  • Cell Biology 64
  • Plant Science 136
  • Information Systems and Management 21
  • Economics and Econometrics 48
Replace Margaret A. Chmielewski with:
Margaret A. Chmielewski United States
Joanna Sokołowska Poland
Erwin Krauskopf Chile
Zhang Shu China
António Pulgarín Guerrero Spain
Eric Spruyt Belgium
William Clarke United States
A. Hunter Dupree United States
S. M. Lawani Nigeria
Dan E. Krane United States
Paul Bourke relative to Margaret A. Chmielewski United States Margaret A. Chmielewski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Margaret A. Chmielewski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Bourke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Bourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Bourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Bourke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Bourke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Bourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Bourke. The network helps show where Paul Bourke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Paul Bourke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Bourke Line = papers co-authored together Paul Bourke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964154
2 199656
3 199854
4 199940
5
The extent of the potato crop in Ireland at the time of the Famine
196015
6 196511
7
The use of the potato crop in pre-famine Ireland
196810
8 19767
9 19656
10
The Green Paper Issue.
19884
11 19594
12 19653
13 19623
14 19763
15 20012
16 19632
17
A Co-Design Partnership to Develop Universally Designed ICT Applications for People with Intellectual Disability
20182
18 19881
19 19741
20 19621

About Paul Bourke

Paul Bourke is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Plant Science, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (2 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (1 paper), Census and Population Estimation (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (89 citations), Cell Biology (64 citations), Plant Science (136 citations), Information Systems and Management (21 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (48 citations). Paul Bourke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Linda Butler, Thomas Phelan and John Gilligan. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Historical Studies, The Economic History Review, Research Policy, International Journal of Biometeorology and Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact