Patrick Bishop

991 citations
58 papers · 692 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Patrick Bishop

47 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Patrick Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Public Administration 104
  • Communication 45
  • Political Science and International Relations 141
  • Urban Studies 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 195
Replace Scott A. Fritzen with:
Scott A. Fritzen Singapore
Pierre-Gerlier Forest Canada
Élisabeth Martin Canada
Simon A. Andrew United States
Daniel Klimovský Slovakia
Jianxing Yu China
James P. Lester United States
Samuel Nunn United States
Udaya R. Waglé United States
Paul J. Nelson United States
Patrick Bishop relative to Scott A. Fritzen Singapore Scott A. Fritzen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Scott A. Fritzen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Bishop. The network helps show where Patrick Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002287
2 200370
3
The Provisional IRA
198768
4 197066
5 200229
6 200628
7 198214
8
Local Government, Public Enterprise and Ethics
200014
9 200510
10
E-government to E-democracy: High-tech solutions to no-tech problems
20047
11 20116
12 20216
13 19595
14 20185
15
Developing Consent: consultation, participation and governance
20014
16 20194
17 20024
18 19614
19 19814
20
The Irish Empire
20004

About Patrick Bishop

Patrick Bishop is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, History and Communication, having authored 58 papers that have together received 692 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers), E-Government and Public Services (5 papers), Medical History and Innovations (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (3 papers), History of Medicine Studies (2 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers) and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (104 citations), Communication (45 citations), Political Science and International Relations (141 citations), Urban Studies (30 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (195 citations). Patrick Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Glyn Davis, Peter Wing, G. Neumann, John Kane, Lori Anderson, John M. Grange, Noel W. Preston, Haig Patapan, John Wanna and Faiz Tuma. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Journal of Public Administration, PharmacoEconomics, The Spine Journal, Medical History and Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact