P. Schultz

576 citations
15 papers · 430 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

P. Schultz

15 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

P. Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 73
  • Surgery 266
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 79
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 62
  • Biomaterials 27
Replace Anjolie Chhabra with:
Anjolie Chhabra India
Vitas Zemgulis Sweden
Donald A. Kroll United States
John A. Awad Canada
Colin R. Chilvers Canada
Adrien Van Zundert Netherlands
Anne M. Heffernan Ireland
Mina Nishimori Japan
Richard H. Ellis United Kingdom
Jacob L. Hutchins United States
P. Schultz relative to Anjolie Chhabra India Anjolie Chhabra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Anjolie Chhabra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Schultz. The network helps show where P. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside P. Schultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Schultz Line = papers co-authored together P. Schultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199075
2 198856
3 199151
4 199050
5 199143
6 198939
7 198731
8 199124
9 199614
10 198813
11 199612
12 196311
13 19755
14 19894
15 19912

About P. Schultz

P. Schultz is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomaterials and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (8 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (73 citations), Surgery (266 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (79 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (62 citations) and Biomaterials (27 citations). P. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Jørgen B. Dahl, Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Erling Anker-Møller, Palle S. Carlsson, Ronald Dahl, Ole Nørregaard, Phil G. Slade, Daniel Bernard Saleh, Christopher Dean and Peter G. Self. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Anaesthesia, Clays and Clay Minerals and Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact