P. Peyton
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy 4
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 2
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 1
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 7
- Co-authors
- Paul S. Myles (3 shared papers)Brendan Silbert (2 shared papers)Richard Parsons (1 shared paper)Karen Scott Collins (1 shared paper)Konrad Jamrozik (1 shared paper)John R. A. Rigg (1 shared paper)Kate Leslie (4 shared papers)M. J. Paech (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (3 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (3 papers)International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia (2 papers)The Lancet (1 paper)Resuscitation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaBrazilSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
P. Peyton
11 papers receiving 812 citations
P. Peyton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 295
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 451
- Surgery 647
- Developmental Neuroscience 58
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 40
Countries citing papers authored by P. Peyton
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Peyton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Peyton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Peyton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P. Peyton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Peyton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Peyton. The network helps show where P. Peyton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Peyton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 621 |
| 2 | 2008 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 |
About P. Peyton
P. Peyton is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Physiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 861 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (295 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (451 citations), Surgery (647 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (58 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (40 citations). P. Peyton has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Myles, Brendan Silbert, Richard Parsons, Karen Scott Collins, Konrad Jamrozik, John R. A. Rigg, Kate Leslie, M. J. Paech, H. Sivakumar and Matthew T.V. Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, British Journal of Anaesthesia, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, The Lancet and Resuscitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.